Project

A Critical History of Patient Engagement

Exploring taken-for-granted aspects and practices of patient engagement that are considered “normal”, “true”, or “common sense.”

Patient engagement has become “the right thing to do” and the only way to perform research. Yet, scholars have critically questioned the lack of clarity on what patient engagement is and its motivation, bringing attention to the complexities and tensions around patient engagement policies and highlighting that it has become an ideological good without considering the unintended consequences that might cause harm. With the aim of unpacking these critiques further and understanding how patient engagement has become an accepted norm in research, we conduct a historical exploration to offer insights and question the commonsense status that patient engagement has gained over the years.

Co-Leads

Dr. Karime Mescouto

Co-Investigators

Prof. Fiona Webster

Dr. Janet Rankin

Interested in this project?

Contact Us

Connect with the PEPR team

Learn more about our research, or get in touch with someone on our team.

String lights against a very blue sky